PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMAY vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMAY vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMAY achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


ZMAY

1D
0.28%
1M
0.52%
6M
2.33%
YTD
2.57%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.49%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$231.74K$677.58K$2.56M

ZMAY vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZMAY and DBO is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMAY vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZMAY
ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZMAY vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZMAYDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.25

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.36

2.01

+5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.69

6.09

+27.59

ZMAY vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMAY and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMAY vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMAY drawdown since its inception was -0.70%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAY and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMAYDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-90.18%

+89.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-27.73%

+27.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-53.56%

+53.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-62.20%

+62.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

9.96%

-9.81%

Volatility

ZMAY vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) is 0.78%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that ZMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMAYDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

17.75%

-16.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

33.77%

-32.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

38.53%

-36.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.79%

33.35%

-31.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

32.20%

-30.41%

ZMAY vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZMAY vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

ZMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
ZMAY
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZMAY and DBO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to ZMAY (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZMAY dropped -0.70% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 60.30% vs 5.14% for ZMAY. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, ZMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 60.30% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZMAY.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for ZMAY.

ZMAY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZMAY and 0.78% for DBO.

ZMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMAY and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer