ZMAR vs. MMAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZMAR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZMAR returned 7.62% vs 7.67% for MMAX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.

Performance

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMAR achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than MMAX's 3.09% return.

ZMAR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 7.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	2.66%	6.65%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	3.09%	5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMAR and MMAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.62

The correlation between ZMAR and MMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZMAR vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MMAX

MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMAR	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	5.52	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.89	10.56	-4.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.84	2.51	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	22.49	-17.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.39	112.49	-82.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is lower than the MMAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMAR and MMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMAR	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	5.52	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.29	3.13	-0.85

Drawdowns

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMAR drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAR and MMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMAR	MMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-1.93%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	-0.34%	-1.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.13%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.10%	-0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	0.07%	+0.18%

Volatility

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) have volatilities of 0.37% and 0.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMAR	MMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	0.36%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	0.96%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12%	1.39%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.05%	2.49%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.05%	2.49%	+0.56%

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMAR vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

ZMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

Position	TTM	2025
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.27%	1.31%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMAR and MMAX in my portfolio?

ZMAR and MMAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZMAR or MMAX?

ZMAR has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to MMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZMAR dropped -2.30% vs MMAX's -1.93%.

Which ETF is better, ZMAR or MMAX?

On 1-year performance, MMAX leads with 7.67% vs 7.62% for ZMAR. On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZMAR or MMAX?

Over the 1-year period, MMAX has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMAR or MMAX?

MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZMAR or MMAX?

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for ZMAR.

What is the main difference between ZMAR and MMAX?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZMAR and 0.50% for MMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 3.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.