ZMAR vs. BOUT
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT).
ZMAR and BOUT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025. BOUT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2018.
Performance
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.33% | 5.95% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 8.23% | -3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMAR achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 8.23% return.
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOUT
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 8.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZMAR vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank
ZMAR
BOUT
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 0.40 | +1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | 0.66 | +2.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.09 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.65 | +3.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.05 | 1.81 | +17.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.40 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.83 | 0.30 | +1.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMAR and BOUT is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison
ZMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMAR drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAR and BOUT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -36.75% | +34.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -13.73% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -6.50% | +5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -12.55% | +12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 4.95% | -4.57% |
Volatility
ZMAR vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) is 1.19%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that ZMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZMAR | BOUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 8.61% | -7.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 17.18% | -15.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 21.74% | -18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 19.54% | -16.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 22.96% | -19.75% |