ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO
ZLU.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD)) and XMW.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLU.TO is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by BMO, while XMW.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. ZLU.TO is actively managed, while XMW.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLU.TO returned 9.37%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for XMW.TO. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZLU.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for XMW.TO.
Performance
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLU.TO achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than XMW.TO's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLU.TO has outperformed XMW.TO with an annualized return of 9.37%, while XMW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.
ZLU.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.35%
XMW.TO
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 10.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$156.35K | CA$133.62K | CA$138.46K | |
| CA$773.79K | CA$925.85K | CA$819.72K |
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 15.16% | 2.03% | 21.63% | -3.26% | 7.95% | 20.72% | 2.06% | 20.48% | 8.39% | 5.06% |
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 8.78% | 5.84% | 20.05% | 4.68% | -4.33% | 12.80% | 0.51% | 14.74% | 5.95% | 10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLU.TO and XMW.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ZLU.TO and XMW.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Technology
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Healthcare
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Financial Services
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Industrials
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Communication Services
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Real Estate
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Basic Materials
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Energy
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLU.TO
XMW.TO
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLU.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.15 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 5.89 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.49%, which is greater than XMW.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLU.TO and XMW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLU.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.49% | -21.42% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.52% | -5.14% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.15% | -8.59% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.30% | -14.45% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.49% | -21.42% | -4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | 0.00% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -2.71% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.87% | +1.22% |
Volatility
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) at 3.25%. This indicates that ZLU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLU.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 3.25% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 5.87% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 8.00% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 8.77% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 11.06% | +2.92% |
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than XMW.TO's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLU.TO vs. XMW.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than XMW.TO's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.43% | 1.52% | 2.20% | 2.01% | 1.61% | 2.02% | 1.85% |
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 1.67% | 1.95% | 1.97% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.76% | 1.83% | 1.57% | 1.89% | 2.00% | 2.36% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLU.TO and XMW.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZLU.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZLU.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for XMW.TO.
ZLU.TO is categorized as Low Volatility, while XMW.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZLU.TO and 0.48% for XMW.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZLU.TO and XMW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer