ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO
ZLE.TO (BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and HXEM.TO (Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ZLE.TO returned 10.16%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for HXEM.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLE.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXEM.TO.
Performance
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLE.TO achieves a 34.50% return, which is significantly higher than HXEM.TO's 29.69% return.
ZLE.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 34.50%
- 6M
- 31.59%
- 1Y
- 47.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
HXEM.TO
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 29.69%
- 6M
- 29.50%
- 1Y
- 49.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLE.TO BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 34.50% | 18.71% | 15.26% | 6.15% | -11.98% | -6.43% | 4.23% |
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 29.69% | 26.46% | 14.53% | 7.09% | -16.39% | -2.71% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLE.TO and HXEM.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, ZLE.TO and HXEM.TO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLE.TO
HXEM.TO
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO) and Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLE.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.42 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 4.04 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.60 | 13.77 | +4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLE.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum HXEM.TO drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLE.TO and HXEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLE.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.71% | -35.00% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -12.34% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.91% | -15.40% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -29.98% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -3.50% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -13.61% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.61% | -1.06% |
Volatility
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE.TO) is 8.77%, while Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXEM.TO) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that ZLE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLE.TO | HXEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 11.68% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 20.32% | -5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 22.22% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.76% | -4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 17.49% | -3.07% |
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLE.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HXEM.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLE.TO vs. HXEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while HXEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXEM.TO Global X Emerging Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLE.TO BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.33% | 3.13% | 3.61% | 3.54% | 3.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% | 1.82% | 2.13% | 1.39% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLE.TO and HXEM.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXEM.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXEM.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZLE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZLE.TO and 0.25% for HXEM.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZLE.TO and HXEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer