ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. ZLB.TO is actively managed, while ZUQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO returned 10.67%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for ZUQ.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLB.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZUQ.TO.
Performance
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLB.TO achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO has underperformed ZUQ.TO with an annualized return of 10.67%, while ZUQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 3.14% | 25.29% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.07% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLB.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ZLB.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Utilities
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Industrials
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Communication Services
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Real Estate
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
-
Technology
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Energy
ZLB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Healthcare
ZLB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLB.TO
ZUQ.TO
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZLB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.81 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 5.87 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZLB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.56 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.94 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.94 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.94 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLB.TO and ZUQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -26.94% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.36% | -10.57% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.01% | -17.93% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.00% | -26.94% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -26.94% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -0.10% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -4.60% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 3.26% | -1.81% |
Volatility
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that ZLB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 2.31% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 9.60% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.29% | 12.29% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 16.35% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 17.52% | -5.37% |
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.52% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLB.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
ZLB.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZLB.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZLB.TO and ZUQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer