ZLB.TO vs. INDA
ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. ZLB.TO is actively managed, while INDA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO returned 10.66%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for INDA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLB.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZLB.TO is traded in CAD, while INDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLB.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO has outperformed INDA with an annualized return of 10.66%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
INDA
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -7.75%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 5.69% | 20.40% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.11% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -8.77% | -2.01% | 17.83% | 14.37% | -3.17% | 21.30% | 12.10% | 2.10% | 1.18% | 26.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLB.TO and INDA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.35 |
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLB.TO
INDA
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
ZLB.TO
INDA
Consumer Defensive
ZLB.TO
INDA
Utilities
ZLB.TO
INDA
Industrials
ZLB.TO
INDA
Communication Services
ZLB.TO
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
ZLB.TO
INDA
Basic Materials
ZLB.TO
INDA
Real Estate
ZLB.TO
INDA
Technology
ZLB.TO
INDA
Energy
ZLB.TO
-
INDA
Healthcare
ZLB.TO
-
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLB.TO vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
ZLB.TO
INDA
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLB.TO | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.90 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.53 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | -1.17 | +8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum INDA drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLB.TO and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLB.TO | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -39.13% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -18.56% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.01% | -20.76% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.00% | -20.76% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -39.13% | +5.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.24% | +15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -7.42% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 8.42% | -6.49% |
Volatility
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) is 2.63%, while iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that ZLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLB.TO | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 4.44% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 13.22% | -5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.26% | 15.53% | -6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.62% | 16.98% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 22.43% | -10.21% |
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLB.TO vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.88% | 1.99% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLB.TO and INDA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
ZLB.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZLB.TO and 0.69% for INDA.
Find the right allocation for ZLB.TO and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer