ZIVB vs. YXI
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while YXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). ZIVB is actively managed, while YXI is passively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
ZIVB vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -11.31%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- -8.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.98%
- 10Y*
- -7.70%
- ALL TIME*
- -8.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.07K | $33.03K | $33.40K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ZIVB vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 36.51% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVB and YXI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YXI
ZIVB vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVB | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -81.15% | +81.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -78.10% | +78.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -54.50% | +54.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.98% | 21.14% | +52.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 31.29% | +42.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 27.48% | +46.50% |
ZIVB vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than YXI's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.65% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVB and YXI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.65% for YXI.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YXI is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.95% for YXI.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer