ZIVB vs. XRPT
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for XRPT.
Performance
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XRPT
- 1D
- -5.80%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -78.55%
- YTD
- -77.57%
- 1Y
- -95.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.49M | $2.47M | $4.21M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 36.51% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVB and XRPT is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. XRPT — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XRPT
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVB | XRPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XRPT drawdown of -96.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and XRPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | XRPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -96.33% | +96.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -95.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -96.22% | +96.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -66.89% | +66.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 75.67% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | XRPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 101.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.98% | 142.85% | -68.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 145.74% | -71.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 145.74% | -71.76% |
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPT's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. XRPT - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than XRPT's 7.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 7.21% | 1.23% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 4.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVB and XRPT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 7.21%, compared with 4.73% for ZIVB.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while XRPT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.94% for XRPT.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and XRPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer