ZIVB vs. SOLZ
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and SOLZ (Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while SOLZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SOLZ.
Performance
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLZ
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -20.48%
- YTD
- -45.08%
- 6M
- -51.54%
- 1Y
- -59.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
SOLZ Solana ETF | -15.69% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. SOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
SOLZ
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.60 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SOLZ drawdown of -73.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and SOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -73.46% | +73.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -73.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -73.46% | +73.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -34.24% | +34.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.26% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | SOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 49.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 73.90% | -73.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 76.02% | -76.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 76.02% | -76.02% |
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOLZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. SOLZ - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | 4.08% | 1.75% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SOLZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOLZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOLZ is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.95% for SOLZ.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and SOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer