PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIVB vs. ORCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
2.42%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ORCS

1D
1.62%
1M
48.24%
6M
16.98%
YTD
17.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZIVB and ORCS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ORCS drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and ORCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIVBORCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-50.25%

+50.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.68%

+15.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-16.45%

+16.45%

Volatility

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIVBORCSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.06%

59.95%

+32.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.06%

59.95%

+32.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.06%

59.95%

+32.11%

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ORCS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZIVB vs. ORCS - Dividend Comparison

ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than ORCS's 1.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZIVB and ORCS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORCS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORCS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.22% for ORCS.

They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.97% for ORCS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIVB and ORCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer