ZIVB vs. ETHU
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while ETHU is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for ETHU.
Performance
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU
- 1D
- -11.44%
- 1M
- -43.11%
- YTD
- -71.31%
- 6M
- -75.18%
- 1Y
- -75.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -20.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
ETHU
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.54 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ETHU drawdown of -95.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and ETHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -95.03% | +95.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -91.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -95.03% | +95.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -69.40% | +69.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 62.34% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 93.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 137.60% | -137.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 143.09% | -143.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 143.09% | -143.09% |
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHU's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.01% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ETHU is cheaper at 0.94% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHU is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ETHU is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.94% for ETHU.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and ETHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer