ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
ZIU.TO (BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZIU.TO returned 32.52% vs 42.32% for ZNQ.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIU.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZNQ.TO.
Performance
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIU.TO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 22.24% return.
ZIU.TO
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 32.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZNQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 42.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 11.50% | 28.37% | 21.12% | 10.25% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 22.24% | 14.60% | 35.84% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIU.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIU.TO
ZNQ.TO
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIU.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.48 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 3.40 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.79 | 10.71 | +9.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIU.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.71 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.22 | 1.06 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIU.TO and ZNQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIU.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -32.09% | +19.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -12.50% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -6.63% | +5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 3.96% | -2.31% |
Volatility
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) is 2.47%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that ZIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIU.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 4.49% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 11.99% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 15.68% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 20.81% | -8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 22.33% | -9.90% |
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIU.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIU.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.28% | 2.70% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.47% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIU.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZIU.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.
ZIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. ZIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while ZNQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZIU.TO and 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZIU.TO and ZNQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer