ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO
ZIU.TO (BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) are both Canada Equities funds from BMO. ZIU.TO is passively managed, while ZDV.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, ZIU.TO returned 31.32% vs 31.08% for ZDV.TO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZIU.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZDV.TO.
Performance
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIU.TO achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return.
ZIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.17% | 28.37% | 21.12% | 10.25% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 18.56% | 20.17% | 16.52% | 11.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIU.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ZIU.TO and ZDV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIU.TO
ZDV.TO
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIU.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.66 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 4.69 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.04 | 18.24 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIU.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.95 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.18 | 0.68 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum ZDV.TO drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIU.TO and ZDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIU.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -43.21% | +30.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -6.65% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.22% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -5.12% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.71% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) is 2.25%, while BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that ZIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIU.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.49% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 9.69% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 10.57% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 10.94% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 15.11% | -2.69% |
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIU.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIU.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than ZDV.TO's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.57% | 4.10% | 4.10% | 3.63% | 4.48% | 4.11% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.63% |
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.10% | 2.28% | 2.70% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIU.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZIU.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZDV.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZIU.TO and 0.39% for ZDV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZIU.TO and ZDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer