ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO
ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. ZIN.TO is passively managed, while DXN.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZIN.TO returned 13.35%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIN.TO achieves a 24.06% return, which is significantly higher than DXN.TO's 13.74% return.
ZIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 33.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 24.06% | 16.80% | 16.33% | 19.36% | -8.05% | 17.86% | 4.69% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.74% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIN.TO and DXN.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIN.TO
DXN.TO
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIN.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.08 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 9.32 | +4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, which is greater than DXN.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIN.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIN.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -34.85% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -6.50% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.39% | -14.79% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.10% | -18.55% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.25% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -5.74% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) at 2.92%. This indicates that ZIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIN.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 2.92% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 8.88% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 11.16% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 12.85% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.67% | +1.37% |
Dividends
ZIN.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than DXN.TO's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 0.87% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.68% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.32% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIN.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for ZIN.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer