ZIG vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIG (Acquirers Fund) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ZIG is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, ZIG returned 16.94% vs 47.09% for BLCR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZIG charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

ZIG vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.

ZIG

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 47.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIG vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZIG Acquirers Fund	8.67%	-2.67%	11.34%	18.93%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.56%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIG and BLCR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.51

The correlation between ZIG and BLCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZIG vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZIG	BLCR
Consumer Cyclical	38.5%	10.9%
Energy	15.3%	2.2%
Basic Materials	13.4%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	-
Industrials	7.0%	13.5%
Financial Services	6.9%	12.1%
Healthcare	4.3%	7.6%
Technology	4.1%	35.7%
Communication Services	-	11.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

ZIG vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIG

ZIG Risk / Return Rank: 28
ZIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ZIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ZIG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ZIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ZIG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIG vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIG	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	3.05	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	4.02	-2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.52	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	4.61	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	21.86	-17.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIG vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIG and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIG	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	3.05	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.90	-1.55

Drawdowns

ZIG vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIG	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.14%	-21.29%	-15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-10.26%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	-0.37%	-5.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-2.19%	-7.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	2.16%	+1.96%

Volatility

ZIG vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) is 2.97%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that ZIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIG	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	4.45%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	12.24%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	15.54%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	17.47%	+3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.14%	17.47%	+4.67%

ZIG vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIG vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZIG Acquirers Fund	1.76%	1.91%	1.96%	1.07%	1.26%	0.18%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIG and BLCR in my portfolio?

ZIG and BLCR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZIG or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to ZIG (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, ZIG or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 16.94% for ZIG. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, ZIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZIG or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 16.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIG or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for ZIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZIG or BLCR?

ZIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between ZIG and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Acquirers Funds and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for ZIG and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.