PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZIG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.


ZIG

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.00%
YTD
8.67%
6M
5.36%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.21%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZIG
Acquirers Fund
8.67%-2.67%11.34%36.70%-17.34%37.38%-15.76%10.54%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.96%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIG and AVUV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.82

The correlation between ZIG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZIG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZIG
AVUV

Consumer Cyclical

38.5%
18.0%

Energy

15.3%
18.2%

Basic Materials

13.4%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
4.5%

Industrials

7.0%
13.9%

Financial Services

6.9%
25.8%

Healthcare

4.3%
4.2%

Technology

4.1%
7.0%

Communication Services

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ZIG
38.5%
AVUV
18.0%

Energy

ZIG
15.3%
AVUV
18.2%

Basic Materials

ZIG
13.4%
AVUV
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

ZIG
10.1%
AVUV
4.5%

Industrials

ZIG
7.0%
AVUV
13.9%

Financial Services

ZIG
6.9%
AVUV
25.8%

Healthcare

ZIG
4.3%
AVUV
4.2%

Technology

ZIG
4.1%
AVUV
7.0%

Communication Services

ZIG

-

AVUV
2.8%

Real Estate

ZIG

-

AVUV
0.7%

Utilities

ZIG

-

AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIG
ZIG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZIGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

4.61

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

13.69

-9.57

ZIG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZIGAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.10

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.47

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.56

-0.21

Drawdowns

ZIG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.14%

-49.42%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-7.95%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-28.79%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.75%

-28.79%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.12%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-7.95%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

2.67%

+1.45%

Volatility

ZIG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) is 2.97%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that ZIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

4.08%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

11.34%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

17.54%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

22.74%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

28.30%

-6.16%

ZIG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZIG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
ZIG
Acquirers Fund
1.76%1.91%1.96%1.07%1.26%0.18%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZIG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to ZIG (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 9.39% for ZIG. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ZIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for ZIG.

ZIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.

ZIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Acquirers Funds and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for ZIG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer