PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZID.TO achieves a -18.18% return, which is significantly lower than VEE.TO's 13.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZID.TO having a 8.81% annualized return and VEE.TO not far ahead at 9.01%.


ZID.TO

1D
-0.95%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-18.18%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-17.13%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
8.81%

VEE.TO

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.93%
YTD
13.54%
6M
12.96%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF
-18.18%-0.67%19.13%11.89%-4.71%25.55%15.79%7.37%8.20%34.21%
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
13.54%19.32%19.06%6.24%-12.78%0.05%12.32%14.33%-7.95%22.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ZID.TO and VEE.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011

0.48

The correlation between ZID.TO and VEE.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZID.TO
VEE.TO

Financial Services

26.6%
20.5%

Energy

14.2%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
11.2%

Basic Materials

12.9%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
3.9%

Technology

8.7%
26.3%

Industrials

6.3%
7.9%

Utilities

4.2%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.5%
4.1%

Communication Services

0.6%
7.8%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.3%

Financial Services

ZID.TO
26.6%
VEE.TO
20.5%

Energy

ZID.TO
14.2%
VEE.TO
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZID.TO
13.5%
VEE.TO
11.2%

Basic Materials

ZID.TO
12.9%
VEE.TO
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

ZID.TO
8.9%
VEE.TO
3.9%

Technology

ZID.TO
8.7%
VEE.TO
26.3%

Industrials

ZID.TO
6.3%
VEE.TO
7.9%

Utilities

ZID.TO
4.2%
VEE.TO
3.0%

Healthcare

ZID.TO
3.5%
VEE.TO
4.1%

Communication Services

ZID.TO
0.6%
VEE.TO
7.8%

Real Estate

ZID.TO
0.5%
VEE.TO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZID.TO
ZID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ZID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VEE.TO
VEE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZID.TOVEE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.39

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

2.97

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

10.74

-12.24

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZID.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZID.TO and VEE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZID.TOVEE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

2.08

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.49

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.53

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.44

-0.09

Drawdowns

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZID.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, which is greater than VEE.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZID.TO and VEE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZID.TOVEE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.18%

-29.84%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.35%

-10.74%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.08%

-14.97%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.08%

-26.10%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

-29.84%

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.57%

-0.90%

-24.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-8.73%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.46%

2.96%

+8.50%

Volatility

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZID.TOVEE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.04%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

12.86%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

15.31%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

15.29%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

16.97%

+2.88%

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZID.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VEE.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VEE.TO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEE.TO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF
1.91%2.26%2.45%2.83%3.35%2.18%1.61%2.71%2.21%1.89%1.99%2.53%
ZID.TO
BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF
0.84%0.69%0.28%1.18%0.29%1.24%0.11%0.11%0.74%0.38%1.15%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZID.TO and VEE.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZID.TO.

ZID.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VEE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. ZID.TO tracks MSCI India ESG Leaders Index, while VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZID.TO and 0.25% for VEE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZID.TO and VEE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer