ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO
ZID.TO (BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF) and VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZID.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India ESG Leaders Index, while VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZID.TO returned 8.81%/yr vs 9.01%/yr for VEE.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZID.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VEE.TO.
Performance
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZID.TO achieves a -18.18% return, which is significantly lower than VEE.TO's 13.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZID.TO having a 8.81% annualized return and VEE.TO not far ahead at 9.01%.
ZID.TO
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -18.18%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
VEE.TO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZID.TO BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF | -18.18% | -0.67% | 19.13% | 11.89% | -4.71% | 25.55% | 15.79% | 7.37% | 8.20% | 34.21% |
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 13.54% | 19.32% | 19.06% | 6.24% | -12.78% | 0.05% | 12.32% | 14.33% | -7.95% | 22.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZID.TO and VEE.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ZID.TO and VEE.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Energy
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Basic Materials
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Technology
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Industrials
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Utilities
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Healthcare
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Communication Services
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Real Estate
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZID.TO
VEE.TO
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZID.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.39 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.97 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 10.74 | -12.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZID.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 2.08 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.49 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZID.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, which is greater than VEE.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZID.TO and VEE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZID.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.18% | -29.84% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.35% | -10.74% | -13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.08% | -14.97% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.08% | -26.10% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -29.84% | -15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.57% | -0.90% | -24.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -8.73% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 2.96% | +8.50% |
Volatility
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZID.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZID.TO | VEE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 6.04% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 12.86% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 15.31% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 15.29% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 16.97% | +2.88% |
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZID.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VEE.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZID.TO vs. VEE.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VEE.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.83% | 3.35% | 2.18% | 1.61% | 2.71% | 2.21% | 1.89% | 1.99% | 2.53% |
ZID.TO BMO MSCI India ESG Leaders Index ETF | 0.84% | 0.69% | 0.28% | 1.18% | 0.29% | 1.24% | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.74% | 0.38% | 1.15% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZID.TO and VEE.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZID.TO.
ZID.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VEE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. ZID.TO tracks MSCI India ESG Leaders Index, while VEE.TO tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZID.TO and 0.25% for VEE.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZID.TO and VEE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer