ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIC.TO (BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIC.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZIC.TO returned 3.47%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIC.TO achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ZIC.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 3.47%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.

ZIC.TO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: -0.75%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 6.85%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

ZEB.TO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 19.22%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 60.22%
• 3Y*: 32.73%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: 15.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZIC.TO BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	1.06%	4.24%	11.86%	6.33%	-8.93%	-1.36%	6.51%	9.03%	6.40%	-1.26%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	19.22%	43.43%	24.58%	10.87%	-10.38%	39.38%	3.52%	16.06%	-8.85%	14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2013	-0.18

The correlation between ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIC.TO

ZIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 34
ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ZIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ZIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ZIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ZIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ZEB.TO

ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIC.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	4.79	-3.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	6.54	-4.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.90	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	7.17	-5.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	30.84	-27.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIC.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	4.79	-3.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	1.35	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.94	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.88	-0.29

Drawdowns

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIC.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.49%	-39.69%	+20.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.26%	-8.44%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.96%	-14.80%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.66%	-25.97%	+10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.49%	-39.69%	+20.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-2.00%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-5.65%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.96%	+0.01%

Volatility

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) is 1.68%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that ZIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIC.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.68%	4.89%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.17%	11.14%	-6.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.47%	12.62%	-7.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.95%	13.52%	-5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.91%	16.91%	-8.00%

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZIC.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.54%	2.95%	3.98%	4.75%	4.29%	3.13%	4.15%	3.65%	3.64%	3.02%	3.19%	3.70%
ZIC.TO BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	4.32%	4.03%	3.79%	3.84%	3.93%	3.52%	3.46%	3.56%	3.46%	3.32%	3.29%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO in my portfolio?

ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZIC.TO or ZEB.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIC.TO or ZEB.TO?

ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between ZIC.TO and ZEB.TO?

ZIC.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. ZIC.TO tracks Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index.