ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO
ZHY.TO (BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and VEQT.TO (Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - ZHY.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged, while VEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. ZHY.TO is passively managed, while VEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZHY.TO returned 2.53%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for VEQT.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZHY.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for VEQT.TO.
Performance
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZHY.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than VEQT.TO's 13.42% return.
ZHY.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
VEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 0.71% | 6.27% | 6.04% | 11.48% | -12.80% | 4.03% | 3.31% | 8.11% |
VEQT.TO Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 13.42% | 20.37% | 24.73% | 16.70% | -10.76% | 19.62% | 11.42% | 12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHY.TO and VEQT.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ZHY.TO and VEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZHY.TO
VEQT.TO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ZHY.TO
VEQT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZHY.TO
VEQT.TO
Energy
ZHY.TO
VEQT.TO
Basic Materials
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Communication Services
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Financial Services
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Healthcare
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Real Estate
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Technology
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Utilities
ZHY.TO
-
VEQT.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZHY.TO
VEQT.TO
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZHY.TO | VEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.52 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 4.07 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 17.94 | -11.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZHY.TO | VEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.83 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 1.10 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, smaller than the maximum VEQT.TO drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHY.TO and VEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHY.TO | VEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.44% | -30.45% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -8.05% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.70% | -15.46% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -18.32% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -3.71% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.83% | -1.04% |
Volatility
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) is 1.96%, while Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that ZHY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHY.TO | VEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 3.66% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 9.39% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.50% | 11.61% | -6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.51% | 12.90% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.92% | 15.77% | -4.85% |
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHY.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VEQT.TO's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHY.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than VEQT.TO's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEQT.TO Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.25% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 2.09% | 1.40% | 1.48% | 1.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHY.TO BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.13% | 6.43% | 6.71% | 5.49% | 6.09% | 6.50% | 6.25% | 6.10% | 5.84% | 7.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZHY.TO and VEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZHY.TO.
ZHY.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZHY.TO and 0.24% for VEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZHY.TO and VEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer