PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZHOG vs. DEFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) and Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZHOG achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than DEFR's -0.45% return.


ZHOG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DEFR

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.06%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
5.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
0.77%5.42%
DEFR
Aptus Deferred Income ETF
-0.45%6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHOG and DEFR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.69

The correlation between ZHOG and DEFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZHOG vs. DEFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHOG
ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DEFR
DEFR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DEFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEFR Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DEFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEFR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) and Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZHOGDEFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.20

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.49

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.40

4.19

+14.21

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZHOG Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the DEFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZHOG and DEFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZHOGDEFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50

1.10

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

1.15

+0.47

Drawdowns

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHOG drawdown since its inception was -3.66%, smaller than the maximum DEFR drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHOG and DEFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZHOGDEFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-3.90%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-3.90%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.74%

+2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.93%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.38%

-1.08%

Volatility

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) is 0.45%, while Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that ZHOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZHOGDEFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

1.40%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

3.26%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59%

5.27%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.01%

5.30%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

5.30%

-1.29%

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHOG has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than DEFR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZHOG vs. DEFR - Dividend Comparison

ZHOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DEFR
Aptus Deferred Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
5.11%5.35%5.50%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZHOG and DEFR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEFR has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to ZHOG (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHOG dropped -3.66% vs DEFR's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, DEFR leads with 5.79% vs 5.54% for ZHOG. On fees, ZHOG is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ZHOG has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DEFR has performed better with a 5.79% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZHOG is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DEFR.

ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for ZHOG and 0.79% for DEFR.

ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZHOG and DEFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer