PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZHDG vs. XSPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZHDG

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.65%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.49%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*

XSPI

1D
-0.89%
1M
5.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZHDG and XSPI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZHDG vs. XSPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHDG
ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XSPI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZHDGXSPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZHDGXSPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.55

-1.03

Drawdowns

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than XSPI's maximum drawdown of -11.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and XSPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZHDGXSPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-11.59%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.89%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-2.23%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZHDGXSPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

17.64%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

17.64%

-5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

17.64%

-5.89%

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZHDG and XSPI have an expense ratio of 0.98%.


Dividends

ZHDG vs. XSPI - Dividend Comparison

ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than XSPI's 6.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF
6.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.44%2.57%2.59%1.52%3.58%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ZHDG and XSPI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.98% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZHDG and XSPI have the same expense ratio: 0.98% per year.

XSPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.

They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and NEOS Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZHDG and XSPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer