PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZHDG vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.


ZHDG

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.65%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.49%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-1.37%
1M
7.48%
YTD
37.04%
6M
39.21%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
5.12%14.34%4.19%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.04%41.00%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHDG and TSMY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.57

The correlation between ZHDG and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZHDG vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHDG
ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZHDGTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

5.98

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

22.18

-13.20

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZHDG and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZHDGTSMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

3.21

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.56

-1.04

Drawdowns

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZHDGTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-31.15%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-15.50%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.37%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-5.51%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

4.17%

-2.12%

Volatility

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) is 2.80%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that ZHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZHDGTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

9.52%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

22.68%

-14.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

28.87%

-18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

33.22%

-21.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

33.22%

-21.47%

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZHDG vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than TSMY's 52.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.19%56.76%13.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.44%2.57%2.59%1.52%3.58%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZHDG and TSMY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMY has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to ZHDG (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs 18.31% for ZHDG. On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs 18.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.19%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.

They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZHDG and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer