ZHDG vs. ROCQ
ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZHDG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by ZEGA, while ROCQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCQ.
Performance
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROCQ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 10.09% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 17.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHDG and ROCQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHDG vs. ROCQ — Risk / Return Rank
ZHDG
ROCQ
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZHDG | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZHDG | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 7.49 | -6.97 |
Drawdowns
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -5.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and ROCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHDG | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.27% | -5.15% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.33% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -0.66% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHDG | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 16.13% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 16.13% | -4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 16.13% | -4.38% |
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHDG vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison
ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than ROCQ's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ZHDG and ROCQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.
ZHDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.02% for ROCQ.
ZHDG is categorized as Derivative Income, while ROCQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.35% for ROCQ.
Find the right allocation for ZHDG and ROCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer