PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZHDG vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 7.95% return.


ZHDG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
2.19%
6M
1.96%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
7.95%
6M
6.98%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.19%14.34%18.02%7.35%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
7.95%16.25%21.77%13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHDG and GPIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.84

The correlation between ZHDG and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZHDG vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHDG
ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZHDGGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.73

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

13.16

-7.00

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZHDG and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZHDGGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-17.50%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-7.71%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-2.25%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-1.48%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.60%

+0.54%

Volatility

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZHDGGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.20%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

8.70%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

10.77%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

13.87%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.81%

13.87%

-2.06%

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZHDG vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than GPIX's 8.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.14%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.51%2.57%2.59%1.52%3.58%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ZHDG and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GPIX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to ZHDG (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 20.94% vs 13.14% for ZHDG. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 20.94% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 2.51% for ZHDG.

They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZHDG and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer