ZHDG vs. GPIX
ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZHDG returned 13.14% vs 20.94% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 7.95% return.
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.19% | 14.34% | 18.02% | 7.35% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 7.95% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHDG and GPIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ZHDG and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHDG vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
ZHDG
GPIX
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZHDG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.73 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 13.16 | -7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHDG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.27% | -17.50% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -7.71% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.25% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -1.48% | -6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.60% | +0.54% |
Volatility
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHDG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.20% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 8.70% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 10.77% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 13.87% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 13.87% | -2.06% |
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHDG vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than GPIX's 8.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.14% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ZHDG and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GPIX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to ZHDG (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 20.94% vs 13.14% for ZHDG. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 20.94% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for ZHDG.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 2.51% for ZHDG.
They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZHDG and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer