ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ZGQ.TO (BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF) and VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) are both Global Equities funds. ZGQ.TO is passively managed, while VVL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZGQ.TO returned 14.72%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for VVL.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZGQ.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for VVL.TO.

Performance

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGQ.TO achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than VVL.TO's 17.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGQ.TO has outperformed VVL.TO with an annualized return of 14.72%, while VVL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.

ZGQ.TO

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -0.95%
• 6M: 8.24%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

VVL.TO

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 3.91%
• 6M: 11.32%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: 20.05%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZGQ.TO BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF	12.75%	8.06%	29.51%	29.44%	-18.72%	21.48%	22.46%	28.96%	-0.05%	19.61%
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	17.21%	18.01%	15.01%	16.57%	0.50%	29.77%	-3.29%	13.44%	-9.39%	12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2016	0.54

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZGQ.TO	VVL.TO
Technology	40.5%	10.5%
Healthcare	13.6%	10.8%
Communication Services	12.8%	6.1%
Industrials	10.9%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	6.5%
Financial Services	6.9%	25.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	14.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	6.0%
Energy	0.3%	9.4%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.9%
Utilities	0.1%	0.0%

Return for Risk

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGQ.TO

ZGQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 53
ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ZGQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ZGQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ZGQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ZGQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

VVL.TO

VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZGQ.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.21	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.20	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.39	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.45	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	13.60	-4.95

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGQ.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-43.88%	+17.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-8.83%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-18.07%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.67%	-18.07%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.67%	-43.88%	+17.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.45%	-0.88%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-5.73%	+1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	2.24%	+0.09%

Volatility

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) at 3.21%. This indicates that ZGQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGQ.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	3.21%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	9.57%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.68%	13.84%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	16.07%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	18.77%	-2.60%

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGQ.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZGQ.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VVL.TO's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	1.61%	1.89%	2.19%	2.69%	2.57%	1.50%	1.70%	2.65%	2.15%	1.35%	0.60%	0.00%
ZGQ.TO BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF	0.49%	0.62%	0.93%	1.38%	1.39%	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	1.58%	1.15%	1.40%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO in my portfolio?

ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZGQ.TO or VVL.TO?

On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZGQ.TO or VVL.TO?

VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ZGQ.TO.

What is the main difference between ZGQ.TO and VVL.TO?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZGQ.TO and 0.38% for VVL.TO.