ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZGQ.TO (BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF) and HEQT.TO (Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ZGQ.TO is passively managed, while HEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZGQ.TO returned 13.96%/yr vs 16.77%/yr for HEQT.TO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZGQ.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HEQT.TO.

Performance

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZGQ.TO having a 13.23% return and HEQT.TO slightly higher at 13.56%.

ZGQ.TO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 6M: 8.19%
• 1Y: 25.52%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.07%

HEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 13.18%
• 1Y: 31.58%
• 3Y*: 25.58%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZGQ.TO BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF	13.23%	8.04%	29.47%	29.38%	-18.76%	21.44%	22.41%	9.36%
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF	13.56%	19.82%	25.95%	31.63%	-12.65%	23.11%	16.34%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019	0.77

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGQ.TO

ZGQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ZGQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ZGQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ZGQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ZGQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

HEQT.TO

HEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 80
HEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGQ.TO	HEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.65	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.70	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.50	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	3.74	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.30	16.49	-5.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the HEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGQ.TO	HEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	2.65	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	1.10	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	1.05	-0.13

Drawdowns

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum HEQT.TO drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGQ.TO	HEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.68%	-31.82%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-8.49%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.36%	-15.33%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.68%	-24.25%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.58%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-4.29%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	1.92%	+0.35%

Volatility

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) at 3.53%. This indicates that ZGQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGQ.TO	HEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	3.53%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.49%	9.67%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	11.96%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	15.33%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.15%	17.16%	-1.01%

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGQ.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZGQ.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than HEQT.TO's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF	1.61%	1.70%	3.22%	7.85%	7.31%	0.48%	1.40%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZGQ.TO BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF	0.49%	0.60%	0.90%	1.33%	1.34%	0.86%	0.99%	1.10%	1.51%	1.09%	1.35%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO in my portfolio?

ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZGQ.TO or HEQT.TO?

On fees, HEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZGQ.TO or HEQT.TO?

HEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ZGQ.TO.

What is the main difference between ZGQ.TO and HEQT.TO?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZGQ.TO and 0.20% for HEQT.TO.