PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZGD.TO (BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF) and ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZGD.TO is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Gold Index, while ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZGD.TO is passively managed, while ZDV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZGD.TO returned 18.07%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ZDV.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZGD.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZDV.TO.

Performance

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGD.TO achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGD.TO has outperformed ZDV.TO with an annualized return of 18.07%, while ZDV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.

ZGD.TO

1D
-3.34%
1M
2.10%
YTD
6.26%
6M
13.53%
1Y
83.82%
3Y*
55.62%
5Y*
30.59%
10Y*
18.07%

ZDV.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.61%
YTD
18.56%
6M
13.14%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZGD.TO
BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF		6.26%170.64%37.48%10.17%-2.30%-12.57%26.59%53.72%-12.09%-0.73%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		18.56%20.17%16.52%7.83%-1.93%28.40%-3.84%22.34%-10.95%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012

0.15

Over the past year, ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZGD.TO
ZDV.TO

Basic Materials

100.0%
10.6%

Communication Services

-

5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

27.2%

Financial Services

-

35.2%

Healthcare

-

0.9%

Industrials

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

10.1%

Basic Materials

ZGD.TO
100.0%
ZDV.TO
10.6%

Communication Services

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
2.2%

Energy

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
27.2%

Financial Services

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
35.2%

Healthcare

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
0.9%

Industrials

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
2.7%

Real Estate

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
4.1%

Technology

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO

-

Utilities

ZGD.TO

-

ZDV.TO
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF

BMO Canadian Dividend ETF

Often compared with ZGD.TO:
ZGD.TO vs. XGD.TOZGD.TO vs. GLDZGD.TO vs. AMAX.TOZGD.TO vs. ZMT.TOZGD.TO vs. GDXUZGD.TO vs. SGDMZGD.TO vs. RGPM.NEO
Often compared with ZDV.TO:
ZDV.TO vs. VDY.TOZDV.TO vs. XEI.TOZDV.TO vs. XDIV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZWC.TOZDV.TO vs. ZCN.TOZDV.TO vs. XDV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZDY.TO

Return for Risk

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZGD.TO
ZGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO
ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZGD.TOZDV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.87
2.95

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
3.40

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.66

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.69

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

18.24

-10.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZGD.TOZDV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.95

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.26

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.73

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.68

-0.39

Drawdowns

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.12%, which is greater than ZDV.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZGD.TOZDV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.12%

-43.21%

-16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.15%

-6.65%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-9.04%

-21.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.75%

-16.72%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

-43.21%

-8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.75%

-0.22%

-22.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.33%

-5.12%

-23.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.06%

1.71%

+9.35%

Volatility

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.70% compared to BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that ZGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZGD.TOZDV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.70%

2.49%

+13.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.43%

9.69%

+26.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.11%

10.57%

+34.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.41%

10.94%

+25.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.35%

15.11%

+22.24%

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGD.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZGD.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than ZDV.TO's 2.68% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		2.68%3.07%3.57%4.10%4.10%3.63%4.48%4.11%5.06%3.96%3.84%4.63%
ZGD.TO
BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF		0.21%0.22%0.59%0.76%0.77%0.38%0.16%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.32%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZDV.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZGD.TO.

ZGD.TO is categorized as Gold, while ZDV.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ZGD.TO and 0.39% for ZDV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGD.TO and ZDV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer