PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGB.TO achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than ZSP.TO's 12.15% return.


ZGB.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.66%
YTD
1.62%
6M
0.49%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*

ZSP.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.18%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZGB.TO
BMO Government Bond Index ETF
1.62%1.54%3.30%5.92%-12.38%-2.74%8.37%5.42%3.57%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
12.15%12.02%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.53%15.61%24.69%-1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018

0.04

Over the past year, ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGB.TO
ZGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGB.TOZSP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.47

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.38

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

12.70

-10.73

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGB.TOZSP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.53

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.13

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.15

-0.89

Drawdowns

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGB.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, smaller than the maximum ZSP.TO drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGB.TOZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-26.94%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-8.61%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-18.95%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-22.25%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-0.29%

-4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-3.34%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.29%

-0.99%

Volatility

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) is 1.84%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that ZGB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGB.TOZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

3.14%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

8.65%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

11.53%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

14.97%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

16.36%

-10.21%

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGB.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZGB.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than ZSP.TO's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZGB.TO
BMO Government Bond Index ETF
3.04%2.81%2.69%2.71%2.76%2.38%2.26%2.41%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.44%1.47%1.63%1.63%2.20%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZGB.TO.

ZGB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. ZGB.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Government Bond Index, while ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZGB.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGB.TO and ZSP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer