PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSTB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGB.TO achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than XSTB.TO's 0.99% return.


ZGB.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
1.59%
YTD
1.73%
6M
0.92%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*

XSTB.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZGB.TO
BMO Government Bond Index ETF
1.73%1.54%3.30%5.92%-12.38%-2.74%8.37%2.73%
XSTB.TO
iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
0.99%3.60%5.28%4.86%-3.91%-1.12%4.95%1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.55

The correlation between ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGB.TO
ZGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ZGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTB.TO
XSTB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XSTB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) and iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSTB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGB.TOXSTB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.29

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.03

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

6.14

-4.25

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XSTB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGB.TOXSTB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.47

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.77

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.80

-0.54

Drawdowns

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGB.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than XSTB.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGB.TOXSTB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-6.92%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-1.35%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-1.35%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-6.76%

-9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-0.14%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-1.42%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.45%

+0.85%

Volatility

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Government Bond Index ETF (ZGB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSTB.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that ZGB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGB.TOXSTB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

0.69%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

1.51%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

1.86%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

2.53%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

2.72%

+3.43%

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZGB.TO vs. XSTB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than XSTB.TO's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XSTB.TO
iShares ESG Aware Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
2.88%2.88%2.64%2.22%1.93%1.82%2.10%1.83%0.00%
ZGB.TO
BMO Government Bond Index ETF
3.04%2.81%2.69%2.71%2.76%2.38%2.26%2.41%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

ZGB.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Government Bond Index, while XSTB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGB.TO and XSTB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer