ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
ZFN.TO (BMO SIA Focused North American Equity Fund) and FLVC.NEO (Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. ZFN.TO is actively managed, while FLVC.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, ZFN.TO returned 13.73% vs 36.38% for FLVC.NEO. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZFN.TO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLVC.NEO.
Performance
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFN.TO achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.
ZFN.TO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 13.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
FLVC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 21.86%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$134.83K | CA$145.15K | CA$488.47K | |
| CA$170.59K | CA$152.77K | CA$257.53K |
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZFN.TO BMO SIA Focused North American Equity Fund | 1.20% | 12.52% | 16.24% |
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 21.78% | 21.15% | 13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFN.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.20 |
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Technology
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Industrials
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Energy
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Healthcare
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
-
Utilities
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Communication Services
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
Basic Materials
ZFN.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
ZFN.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
Consumer Defensive
ZFN.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
Real Estate
ZFN.TO
-
FLVC.NEO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ZFN.TO
FLVC.NEO
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO SIA Focused North American Equity Fund (ZFN.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZFN.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 2.02 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 12.45 | -11.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 55.03 | -53.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFN.TO and FLVC.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFN.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -7.89% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -3.21% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -0.50% | -6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -0.80% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | 0.71% | +6.21% |
Volatility
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison
BMO SIA Focused North American Equity Fund (ZFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) at 2.84%. This indicates that ZFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLVC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZFN.TO | FLVC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 2.84% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 5.74% | +9.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 7.91% | +14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 11.38% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 11.38% | +5.06% |
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZFN.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZFN.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ZFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLVC.NEO Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.70% | 4.96% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZFN.TO BMO SIA Focused North American Equity Fund | 0.49% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 2.37% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.37% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZFN.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ZFN.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ZFN.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.
Find the right allocation for ZFN.TO and FLVC.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer