ZFEB vs. SFLR
ZFEB (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZFEB returned 7.80% vs 19.44% for SFLR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 5.55% return.
ZFEB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February | 2.36% | 6.10% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.55% | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFEB and SFLR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ZFEB and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZFEB vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
ZFEB
SFLR
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZFEB | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.42 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.81 | 2.87 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.36 | 11.73 | +16.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZFEB | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55 | 2.20 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 1.71 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFEB | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -12.13% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -6.79% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.38% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -1.74% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 1.66% | -1.38% |
Volatility
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) is 0.38%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that ZFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZFEB | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 1.87% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 6.46% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 8.89% | -6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 10.15% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 10.15% | -7.27% |
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZFEB vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
ZFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZFEB and SFLR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLR has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to ZFEB (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZFEB dropped -3.00% vs SFLR's -12.13%.
On 1-year performance, SFLR leads with 19.44% vs 7.80% for ZFEB. On fees, ZFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZFEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 19.44% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for ZFEB.
ZFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 0.89% for SFLR.
ZFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZFEB and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer