PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZFEB vs. PMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.19% return.


ZFEB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.36%
6M
3.03%
1Y
7.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMMY

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.74%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and PMMY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.75

The correlation between ZFEB and PMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB
ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZFEBPMMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

2.45

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

16.90

-11.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.36

89.69

-61.33

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFEB Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is lower than the PMMY Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFEB and PMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZFEBPMMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

5.35

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

4.56

-2.32

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and PMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZFEBPMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-0.36%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-0.36%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.04%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.04%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.07%

+0.21%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) has a higher volatility of 0.38% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.36%. This indicates that ZFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZFEBPMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.36%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

0.87%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

1.12%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

1.39%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

1.39%

+1.49%

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZFEB vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZFEB nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZFEB and PMMY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZFEB has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZFEB dropped -3.00% vs PMMY's -0.36%.

On 1-year performance, ZFEB leads with 7.80% vs 5.98% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZFEB has performed better with a 7.80% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

ZFEB and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 0.50% for PMMY.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 3.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZFEB and PMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer