ZFEB vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ZFEB (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZFEB returned 7.24% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ZFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.

ZFEB

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 7.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	2.19%	6.19%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and CSHP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZFEB	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	11.09	-7.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.32	27.60	-22.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	6.46	-4.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.39	65.45	-60.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.07	381.67	-355.61

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFEB Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFEB and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZFEB	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-0.08%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	-0.06%	-1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.04%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-0.00%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.01%	+0.27%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that ZFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZFEB	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.16%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.51%	0.27%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18%	0.36%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.86%	0.41%	+2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.86%	0.41%	+2.45%

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZFEB vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

ZFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZFEB and CSHP in my portfolio?

ZFEB and CSHP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZFEB or CSHP?

ZFEB has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZFEB dropped -3.00% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, ZFEB or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, ZFEB leads with 7.24% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZFEB or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, ZFEB has performed better with a 7.24% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZFEB or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZFEB or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for ZFEB.

What is the main difference between ZFEB and CSHP?

ZFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.