ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) and ZWEN.TO (BMO Covered Call Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZWEN.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZEQT.TO returned 26.67%/yr vs 18.67%/yr for ZWEN.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEQT.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for ZWEN.TO.

Performance

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) and BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEQT.TO achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly lower than ZWEN.TO's 23.33% return.

ZEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 30.84%
• 3Y*: 26.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZWEN.TO

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.83%
• YTD: 23.33%
• 6M: 24.90%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: 18.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	13.34%	21.71%	30.06%	15.80%
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF	23.33%	6.74%	10.43%	2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2023	0.21

The correlation between ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZEQT.TO	ZWEN.TO
Technology	23.8%	-
Financial Services	20.1%	-
Industrials	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Basic Materials	7.3%	-
Communication Services	6.9%	-
Energy	6.7%	100.0%
Healthcare	6.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEQT.TO

ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 80
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

ZWEN.TO

ZWEN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
ZWEN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ZWEN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ZWEN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ZWEN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ZWEN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) and BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZEQT.TO	ZWEN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.93	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	2.52	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.46	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.64	10.31	+4.33

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the ZWEN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, smaller than the maximum ZWEN.TO drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZEQT.TO	ZWEN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.18%	-18.75%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.72%	-9.50%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.62%	-18.75%	+4.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-7.36%	+5.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-4.38%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	3.19%	-1.08%

Volatility

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) is 4.47%, while BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that ZEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWEN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZEQT.TO	ZWEN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	5.93%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	13.78%	-2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	17.07%	-3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.51%	18.27%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.51%	18.27%	-4.76%

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEQT.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWEN.TO's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZEQT.TO vs. ZWEN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than ZWEN.TO's 7.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF	1.92%	2.89%	5.08%	6.40%	7.31%
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF	7.99%	9.53%	9.09%	8.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO in my portfolio?

ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZEQT.TO or ZWEN.TO?

On fees, ZEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZEQT.TO or ZWEN.TO?

ZEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for ZWEN.TO.

What is the main difference between ZEQT.TO and ZWEN.TO?

ZEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZWEN.TO is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZEQT.TO and 0.88% for ZWEN.TO.