PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZEQ.TO (BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEQ.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Quality 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZEQ.TO is passively managed, while ZDV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEQ.TO returned 8.55%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ZDV.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEQ.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZDV.TO.

Performance

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEQ.TO achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEQ.TO has underperformed ZDV.TO with an annualized return of 8.55%, while ZDV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.

ZEQ.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.57%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.82%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
8.55%

ZDV.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.61%
YTD
18.56%
6M
13.14%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF		1.89%7.89%2.54%15.35%-12.26%25.16%6.22%33.21%-7.10%15.45%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		18.56%20.17%16.52%7.83%-1.93%28.40%-3.84%22.34%-10.95%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.50

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZEQ.TO
ZDV.TO

Healthcare

24.5%
0.9%

Industrials

22.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
2.2%

Technology

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

9.7%
35.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
10.6%

Communication Services

1.5%
5.7%

Utilities

0.3%
10.1%

Energy

-

27.2%

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Healthcare

ZEQ.TO
24.5%
ZDV.TO
0.9%

Industrials

ZEQ.TO
22.4%
ZDV.TO
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

ZEQ.TO
15.3%
ZDV.TO
2.2%

Technology

ZEQ.TO
10.2%
ZDV.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZEQ.TO
9.8%
ZDV.TO
1.4%

Financial Services

ZEQ.TO
9.7%
ZDV.TO
35.2%

Basic Materials

ZEQ.TO
6.2%
ZDV.TO
10.6%

Communication Services

ZEQ.TO
1.5%
ZDV.TO
5.7%

Utilities

ZEQ.TO
0.3%
ZDV.TO
10.1%

Energy

ZEQ.TO

-

ZDV.TO
27.2%

Real Estate

ZEQ.TO

-

ZDV.TO
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF

BMO Canadian Dividend ETF

Often compared with ZEQ.TO:
ZEQ.TO vs. ZEQT.TOZEQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOZEQ.TO vs. XEM.TOZEQ.TO vs. ZWP.TOZEQ.TO vs. VE.TOZEQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TOZEQ.TO vs. XEU.TO
Often compared with ZDV.TO:
ZDV.TO vs. VDY.TOZDV.TO vs. XEI.TOZDV.TO vs. XDIV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZWC.TOZDV.TO vs. ZCN.TOZDV.TO vs. XDV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZDY.TO

Return for Risk

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZEQ.TO
ZEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO
ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZEQ.TOZDV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.32
2.95

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.55
3.40

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.66

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

4.69

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

18.24

-17.14

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZEQ.TOZDV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

2.95

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

1.26

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.68

-0.14

Drawdowns

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum ZDV.TO drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZEQ.TOZDV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-43.21%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-6.65%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-9.04%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-16.72%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.13%

-43.21%

+14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-0.22%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-5.12%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

1.71%

+2.05%

Volatility

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that ZEQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZEQ.TOZDV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

2.49%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

9.69%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

10.57%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

10.94%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.11%

+0.40%

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEQ.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZEQ.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than ZDV.TO's 2.68% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		2.68%3.07%3.57%4.10%4.10%3.63%4.48%4.11%5.06%3.96%3.84%4.63%
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF		3.02%3.10%2.04%2.50%2.62%1.78%1.94%2.04%3.21%2.07%2.01%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZDV.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZEQ.TO.

ZEQ.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while ZDV.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZEQ.TO and 0.39% for ZDV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEQ.TO and ZDV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer