PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZEQ.TO having a 7.34% return and EHE.TO slightly higher at 7.41%.


ZEQ.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
3.84%
YTD
7.34%
6M
6.85%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
8.95%

EHE.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
1.53%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.99%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
7.34%7.89%2.54%15.35%-12.26%25.16%6.22%33.27%-7.03%15.45%
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
7.41%22.91%4.19%22.26%-10.45%23.79%-5.96%24.49%-10.68%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.29

The correlation between ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEQ.TO
EHE.TO

Healthcare

24.9%
8.1%

Industrials

21.7%
22.6%

Consumer Defensive

15.5%
12.4%

Technology

10.8%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
13.5%

Financial Services

9.3%
15.1%

Basic Materials

6.3%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.5%
5.6%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Energy

-

3.7%

Healthcare

ZEQ.TO
24.9%
EHE.TO
8.1%

Industrials

ZEQ.TO
21.7%
EHE.TO
22.6%

Consumer Defensive

ZEQ.TO
15.5%
EHE.TO
12.4%

Technology

ZEQ.TO
10.8%
EHE.TO
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ZEQ.TO
9.8%
EHE.TO
13.5%

Financial Services

ZEQ.TO
9.3%
EHE.TO
15.1%

Basic Materials

ZEQ.TO
6.3%
EHE.TO
6.8%

Communication Services

ZEQ.TO
1.5%
EHE.TO
5.6%

Utilities

ZEQ.TO
0.3%
EHE.TO

-

Real Estate

ZEQ.TO
0.1%
EHE.TO

-

Energy

ZEQ.TO

-

EHE.TO
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEQ.TO
ZEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

EHE.TO
EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) and CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZEQ.TOEHE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.68

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

6.34

-2.75

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.14%, smaller than the maximum EHE.TO drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEQ.TOEHE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.14%

-38.20%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-11.85%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-16.30%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

-22.91%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-5.32%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.13%

+0.24%

Volatility

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) is 3.77%, while CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that ZEQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEQ.TOEHE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

5.06%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

13.37%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

16.28%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

18.09%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

17.45%

-2.08%

Dividends

ZEQ.TO vs. EHE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than EHE.TO's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
2.16%2.16%4.38%3.30%2.19%1.90%2.55%2.02%2.08%1.37%0.13%0.00%
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
2.89%3.10%2.04%2.50%2.62%1.78%1.94%2.08%3.29%2.07%2.01%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZEQ.TO tracks MSCI Europe Quality 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while EHE.TO tracks WisdomTree Europe CAD-Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEQ.TO and EHE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer