ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO
ZEO.TO (BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF) and ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEO.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index, while ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZEO.TO is passively managed, while ZDV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEO.TO returned 10.67%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ZDV.TO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEO.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZDV.TO.
Performance
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEO.TO achieves a 37.72% return, which is significantly higher than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZEO.TO having a 10.67% annualized return and ZDV.TO not far ahead at 10.97%.
ZEO.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.08%
- 5Y*
- 25.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 37.72% | 12.35% | 21.51% | 5.98% | 39.67% | 63.65% | -28.56% | 16.50% | -25.62% | -12.74% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 18.56% | 20.17% | 16.52% | 7.83% | -1.93% | 28.40% | -3.84% | 22.34% | -10.95% | 7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEO.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZEO.TO and ZDV.TO has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEO.TO
ZDV.TO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ZEO.TO
ZDV.TO
Basic Materials
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Communication Services
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Financial Services
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Healthcare
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Industrials
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Real Estate
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Technology
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
-
Utilities
ZEO.TO
-
ZDV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEO.TO
ZDV.TO
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEO.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.66 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 4.69 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.25 | 18.24 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEO.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 2.95 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.73 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.68 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.71%, which is greater than ZDV.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEO.TO and ZDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEO.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.71% | -43.21% | -34.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -6.65% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -9.04% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.59% | -16.72% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.03% | -43.21% | -28.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.22% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -5.12% | -16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.71% | +1.24% |
Volatility
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that ZEO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEO.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 2.49% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 9.69% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 10.57% | +6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 10.94% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 15.11% | +12.16% |
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEO.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than ZDV.TO's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.57% | 4.10% | 4.10% | 3.63% | 4.48% | 4.11% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.63% |
ZEO.TO BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF | 2.59% | 3.42% | 3.86% | 4.82% | 4.69% | 3.27% | 5.54% | 3.55% | 3.57% | 2.46% | 2.50% | 4.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEO.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDV.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.
ZEO.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while ZDV.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ZEO.TO and 0.39% for ZDV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEO.TO and ZDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer