PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZEM.TO (BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEM.TO returned 11.09%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEM.TO charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XEG.TO.

Performance

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEM.TO achieves a 29.19% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEM.TO has underperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 11.09%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.

ZEM.TO

1D
-0.57%
1M
10.97%
YTD
29.19%
6M
29.85%
1Y
58.51%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.09%

XEG.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
44.34%
6M
39.73%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
29.48%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEM.TO
BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF		29.19%27.66%15.21%7.38%-15.80%-2.64%16.41%13.20%-8.06%30.19%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		44.34%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEM.TO and XEG.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2009

0.34

The correlation between ZEM.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZEM.TO
XEG.TO

Technology

37.0%

-

Financial Services

20.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Communication Services

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Energy

4.0%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Healthcare

2.7%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Technology

ZEM.TO
37.0%
XEG.TO

-

Financial Services

ZEM.TO
20.1%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZEM.TO
9.7%
XEG.TO

-

Industrials

ZEM.TO
7.6%
XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

ZEM.TO
6.8%
XEG.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZEM.TO
6.4%
XEG.TO

-

Energy

ZEM.TO
4.0%
XEG.TO
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

ZEM.TO
3.0%
XEG.TO

-

Healthcare

ZEM.TO
2.7%
XEG.TO

-

Utilities

ZEM.TO
2.0%
XEG.TO

-

Real Estate

ZEM.TO
0.8%
XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Often compared with ZEM.TO:
ZEM.TO vs. XEC.TOZEM.TO vs. VEE.TOZEM.TO vs. XEF.TOZEM.TO vs. VIU.TOZEM.TO vs. XSEM.TOZEM.TO vs. xec.TOZEM.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Often compared with XEG.TO:
XEG.TO vs. XLEXEG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEG.TO vs. CNQ.TOXEG.TO vs. HXE.TOXEG.TO vs. ZEO.TOXEG.TO vs. XDIV.TOXEG.TO vs. XCG.TO

Return for Risk

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZEM.TO
ZEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZEM.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.79
3.11

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.70
3.66

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.49

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

6.36

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.35

19.02

-0.67

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEM.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZEM.TOXEG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

3.11

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.04

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.36

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.28

+0.14

Drawdowns

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEM.TO and XEG.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZEM.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-87.74%

+52.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-11.12%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.59%

-25.67%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

-28.42%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.79%

-79.66%

+44.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-4.00%

+3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-29.19%

+19.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.71%

-0.51%

Volatility

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM.TO) is 8.78%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that ZEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZEM.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

9.31%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.99%

18.99%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

22.76%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

28.62%

-11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

33.41%

-14.85%

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEM.TO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZEM.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than XEG.TO's 2.65% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		2.65%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
ZEM.TO
BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF		1.73%2.23%2.56%2.87%2.89%2.50%1.69%2.42%2.20%1.76%4.19%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZEM.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEM.TO is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEM.TO is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XEG.TO.

ZEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. ZEM.TO tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ZEM.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEM.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer