ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO returned 15.82%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for ZUQ.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZUQ.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZEB.TO having a 15.82% annualized return and ZUQ.TO not far ahead at 16.38%.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
ZUQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
-
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
ZUQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
ZUQ.TO
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.30 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | 1.81 | +5.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.84 | 5.87 | +24.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79 | 1.56 | +3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 0.94 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -26.94% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -10.57% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -17.93% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -26.94% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -26.94% | -12.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -0.10% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -4.60% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.26% | -1.30% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that ZEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 2.31% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 9.60% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.29% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.35% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 17.52% | -0.61% |
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer