PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZEB.TO having a 15.82% annualized return and ZUQ.TO not far ahead at 16.38%.


ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%

ZUQ.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
5.91%
YTD
9.39%
6M
3.18%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
9.39%5.78%34.02%33.24%-18.33%26.40%19.92%31.74%4.70%16.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014

0.37

The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEB.TO
ZUQ.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.1%

Energy

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

14.8%

Industrials

-

11.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

33.8%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

ZEB.TO
100.0%
ZUQ.TO
10.1%

Basic Materials

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
1.7%

Communication Services

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
11.1%

Energy

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
0.2%

Healthcare

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
14.8%

Industrials

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
11.0%

Real Estate

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO

-

Technology

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
33.8%

Utilities

ZEB.TO

-

ZUQ.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ZUQ.TO
ZUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEB.TOZUQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.30

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.17

1.81

+5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.84

5.87

+24.98

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.79, which is higher than the ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEB.TOZUQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.79

1.56

+3.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

0.94

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.94

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.94

-0.05

Drawdowns

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEB.TOZUQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-26.94%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-10.57%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-17.93%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-26.94%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-26.94%

-12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.10%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-4.60%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.26%

-1.30%

Volatility

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that ZEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEB.TOZUQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

2.31%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

9.60%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

12.29%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

16.35%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.52%

-0.61%

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZEB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
0.43%0.46%0.57%0.86%0.99%0.80%0.96%0.96%1.07%1.16%1.00%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.

ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and ZUQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer