ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO returned 15.82%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for XIT.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XIT.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than XIT.TO's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has underperformed XIT.TO with an annualized return of 15.82%, while XIT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.57% annualized return.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -4.19% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.73% | 45.91% | 60.77% | 11.71% | 17.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and XIT.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2009 | 0.37 |
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
XIT.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
XIT.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
XIT.TO
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEB.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.08 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | 0.31 | +6.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.84 | 0.62 | +30.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEB.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79 | 0.31 | +4.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 0.28 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.66 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.30 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum XIT.TO drawdown of -81.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and XIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -81.18% | +41.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -31.93% | +23.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -31.93% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -54.15% | +28.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -54.15% | +14.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -14.47% | +12.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -26.86% | +21.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 15.74% | -13.78% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) is 4.89%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that ZEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 11.83% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 24.39% | -13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 31.36% | -18.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 29.37% | -15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 26.71% | -9.80% |
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XIT.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. XIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEB.TO and XIT.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.
ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XIT.TO is Technology Equities. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.60% for XIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and XIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer