ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. ZEB.TO is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZEB.TO returned 18.18%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XEQT.TO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 12.29% return.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 9.32% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 12.29% | 19.47% | 24.36% | 17.25% | -11.01% | 18.94% | 11.82% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ZEB.TO and XEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
XEQT.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
XEQT.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
XEQT.TO
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEB.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.47 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | 3.56 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.84 | 15.50 | +15.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEB.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79 | 2.53 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -29.74% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -8.25% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -15.08% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -19.56% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -0.56% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -4.11% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.89% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that ZEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.70% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 9.38% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 11.63% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 13.12% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.56% | +1.35% |
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.48% | 1.66% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEB.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer