ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and RBNK.TO (RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - ZEB.TO tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index while RBNK.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZEB.TO returned 18.18%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for RBNK.TO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for RBNK.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZEB.TO having a 19.22% return and RBNK.TO slightly higher at 19.94%.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
RBNK.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 6M
- 24.92%
- 1Y
- 60.94%
- 3Y*
- 32.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 3.47% |
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 19.94% | 44.94% | 22.08% | 11.01% | -13.14% | 40.30% | 3.34% | 16.82% | -9.14% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
RBNK.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
RBNK.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
RBNK.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
RBNK.TO
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEB.TO | RBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.85 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.17 | 6.74 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.84 | 29.06 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEB.TO | RBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79 | 4.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.81 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, roughly equal to the maximum RBNK.TO drawdown of -39.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | RBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -39.08% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -9.08% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -14.87% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -28.64% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -1.37% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -7.55% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.10% | -0.14% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) have volatilities of 4.89% and 5.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | RBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 5.06% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 11.66% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 13.33% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 13.90% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 18.21% | -1.30% |
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RBNK.TO's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than RBNK.TO's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 2.97% | 3.39% | 4.50% | 4.77% | 4.49% | 3.07% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 4.06% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RBNK.TO.
ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while RBNK.TO tracks Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.32% for RBNK.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer