PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZEB.TO having a 19.22% return and RBNK.TO slightly higher at 19.94%.


ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%

RBNK.TO

1D
-0.56%
1M
6.40%
YTD
19.94%
6M
24.92%
1Y
60.94%
3Y*
32.53%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%3.47%
RBNK.TO
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF
19.94%44.94%22.08%11.01%-13.14%40.30%3.34%16.82%-9.14%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.95

The correlation between ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEB.TO
RBNK.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

ZEB.TO
100.0%
RBNK.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Communication Services

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Energy

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Healthcare

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Industrials

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Real Estate

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Technology

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Utilities

ZEB.TO

-

RBNK.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RBNK.TO
RBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEB.TORBNK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.85

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.17

6.74

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.84

29.06

+1.78

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.79, which is comparable to the RBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEB.TORBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.79

4.59

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Drawdowns

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, roughly equal to the maximum RBNK.TO drawdown of -39.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEB.TORBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-39.08%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-9.08%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-14.87%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-28.64%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-1.37%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-7.55%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.10%

-0.14%

Volatility

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) have volatilities of 4.89% and 5.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEB.TORBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

5.06%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

11.66%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

13.33%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

13.90%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

18.21%

-1.30%

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RBNK.TO's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZEB.TO vs. RBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than RBNK.TO's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBNK.TO
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF
2.97%3.39%4.50%4.77%4.49%3.07%4.18%3.86%4.06%0.56%0.00%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RBNK.TO.

ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while RBNK.TO tracks Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.32% for RBNK.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and RBNK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer