PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than HXT.TO's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has outperformed HXT.TO with an annualized return of 16.60%, while HXT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.


ZEB.TO

1D
1.12%
1M
9.87%
YTD
25.33%
6M
26.07%
1Y
67.94%
3Y*
34.82%
5Y*
19.53%
10Y*
16.60%

HXT.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
4.35%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.91%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
25.33%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
11.19%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.89%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEB.TO and HXT.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2010

0.77

The correlation between ZEB.TO and HXT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEB.TO
HXT.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
37.3%

Basic Materials

-

12.6%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Energy

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Technology

-

12.0%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Financial Services

ZEB.TO
100.0%
HXT.TO
37.3%

Basic Materials

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
12.6%

Communication Services

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
3.6%

Energy

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
15.9%

Healthcare

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO

-

Industrials

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
8.9%

Real Estate

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
0.5%

Technology

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
12.0%

Utilities

ZEB.TO

-

HXT.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZEB.TOHXT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.49

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.09

4.20

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.80

19.34

+15.46

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.33, which is higher than the HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEB.TO and HXT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -52.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and HXT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEB.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-52.13%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-7.71%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-12.36%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-16.33%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-35.48%

-4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-19.06%

+13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.67%

+0.29%

Volatility

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) at 3.94%. This indicates that ZEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEB.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.94%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

9.57%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.98%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

12.80%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

15.17%

+1.73%

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZEB.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.41%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEB.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer