PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and Diversified Royalty Corp. (DIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly lower than DIV.TO's 29.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has underperformed DIV.TO with an annualized return of 15.82%, while DIV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.72% annualized return.


ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%

DIV.TO

1D
-1.47%
1M
11.49%
YTD
29.82%
6M
30.29%
1Y
70.83%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
16.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%
DIV.TO
Diversified Royalty Corp.
29.82%38.92%16.26%-0.40%14.10%28.13%-16.15%19.62%-12.04%46.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEB.TO and DIV.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2009

0.25

The correlation between ZEB.TO and DIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV.TO
DIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and Diversified Royalty Corp. (DIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEB.TODIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.67

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.17

7.17

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.84

23.14

+7.70

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.79, which is higher than the DIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEB.TO and DIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEB.TODIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.79

3.40

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.60

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.10

+0.78

Drawdowns

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum DIV.TO drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and DIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEB.TODIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-99.64%

+59.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-9.92%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-17.80%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-25.32%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-64.32%

+24.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-56.32%

+54.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-73.54%

+67.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.07%

-1.11%

Volatility

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) is 4.89%, while Diversified Royalty Corp. (DIV.TO) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that ZEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEB.TODIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

9.47%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

14.99%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

20.95%

-8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

20.79%

-7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

27.81%

-10.90%

Dividends

ZEB.TO vs. DIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than DIV.TO's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV.TO
Diversified Royalty Corp.
5.96%7.12%8.59%8.79%7.45%7.41%8.87%7.26%8.06%6.59%8.87%8.39%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEB.TO and DIV.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and DIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer