PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEA.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than VIU.TO's 17.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEA.TO has underperformed VIU.TO with an annualized return of 9.90%, while VIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.


ZEA.TO

1D
0.72%
1M
4.84%
YTD
10.79%
6M
10.55%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.90%

VIU.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
6.34%
YTD
17.08%
6M
17.65%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEA.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF
10.79%24.28%11.56%16.02%-8.51%10.64%5.13%16.71%-6.24%16.77%
VIU.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF
17.08%27.83%10.72%15.66%-10.63%9.74%7.56%15.30%-7.39%19.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEA.TO and VIU.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2015

0.91

The correlation between ZEA.TO and VIU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEA.TO
VIU.TO

Financial Services

24.4%
25.6%

Industrials

20.0%
17.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
10.7%

Technology

10.5%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
6.1%

Basic Materials

6.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.1%

Energy

3.9%
4.1%

Utilities

3.9%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

ZEA.TO
24.4%
VIU.TO
25.6%

Industrials

ZEA.TO
20.0%
VIU.TO
17.1%

Healthcare

ZEA.TO
10.5%
VIU.TO
10.7%

Technology

ZEA.TO
10.5%
VIU.TO
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ZEA.TO
7.6%
VIU.TO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ZEA.TO
6.8%
VIU.TO
6.1%

Basic Materials

ZEA.TO
6.0%
VIU.TO
4.7%

Communication Services

ZEA.TO
4.6%
VIU.TO
3.1%

Energy

ZEA.TO
3.9%
VIU.TO
4.1%

Utilities

ZEA.TO
3.9%
VIU.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

ZEA.TO
1.9%
VIU.TO
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEA.TO
ZEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VIU.TO
VIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEA.TOVIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.83

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

11.39

-3.32

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the VIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEA.TO and VIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEA.TOVIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.17

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.87

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.62

-0.03

Drawdowns

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VIU.TO drawdown of -29.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEA.TO and VIU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEA.TOVIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-29.15%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-11.74%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-14.26%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.67%

-25.35%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

-29.15%

+1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.14%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-5.34%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.91%

-0.12%

Volatility

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VIU.TO) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEA.TOVIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.63%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

13.08%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

15.29%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

13.89%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

15.12%

-0.20%

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than VIU.TO's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZEA.TO vs. VIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VIU.TO's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIU.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF
2.16%2.48%2.55%2.65%2.75%2.37%1.97%2.67%2.75%2.12%1.71%0.27%
ZEA.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF
1.92%2.17%2.77%3.00%3.06%2.48%2.72%2.93%3.03%2.39%2.78%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ZEA.TO and VIU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZEA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VIU.TO.

ZEA.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while VIU.TO is International Equity. ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while VIU.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZEA.TO and 0.23% for VIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEA.TO and VIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer