ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEA.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while HXDM.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZEA.TO returned 11.18%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for HXDM.TO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZEA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HXDM.TO.

Performance

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZEA.TO having a 10.79% return and HXDM.TO slightly lower at 10.44%.

ZEA.TO

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 10.55%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

HXDM.TO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 22.22%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 10.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	10.79%	24.28%	11.56%	16.02%	-8.51%	10.64%	5.13%	16.71%	-6.24%	6.00%
HXDM.TO Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF	10.44%	24.06%	11.07%	15.09%	-8.78%	10.16%	4.59%	15.19%	-7.21%	5.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017	0.90

The correlation between ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZEA.TO	HXDM.TO
Financial Services	24.4%	16.0%
Industrials	20.0%	14.7%
Healthcare	10.5%	14.4%
Technology	10.5%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	11.8%
Basic Materials	6.0%	7.5%
Communication Services	4.6%	6.2%
Energy	3.9%	3.4%
Utilities	3.9%	3.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	3.1%

Return for Risk

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEA.TO

ZEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ZEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ZEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ZEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ZEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 49

HXDM.TO

HXDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 43
HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HXDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HXDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
HXDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HXDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZEA.TO	HXDM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.50	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.14	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.96	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.07	7.57	+0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZEA.TO	HXDM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.50	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.76	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.59	+0.01

Drawdowns

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, roughly equal to the maximum HXDM.TO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZEA.TO	HXDM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.80%	-28.43%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-11.40%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.11%	-14.65%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.67%	-23.87%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-1.36%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-4.74%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.94%	-0.15%

Volatility

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZEA.TO	HXDM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	5.70%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	12.55%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.93%	14.91%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.51%	14.07%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	15.42%	-0.50%

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HXDM.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZEA.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while HXDM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HXDM.TO Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	1.92%	2.17%	2.77%	3.00%	3.06%	2.48%	2.72%	2.93%	3.03%	2.39%	2.78%	2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ZEA.TO or HXDM.TO?

On fees, HXDM.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZEA.TO or HXDM.TO?

HXDM.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZEA.TO.

What is the main difference between ZEA.TO and HXDM.TO?

ZEA.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HXDM.TO is International Equity. ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while HXDM.TO tracks Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZEA.TO and 0.20% for HXDM.TO.