ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both Canada Equities funds from BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDV.TO returned 10.97%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for ZLB.TO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDV.TO achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 3.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZDV.TO having a 10.97% annualized return and ZLB.TO not far behind at 10.67%.

ZDV.TO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 31.08%
• 3Y*: 20.39%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

ZLB.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 14.81%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF	18.56%	20.17%	16.52%	7.83%	-1.93%	28.40%	-3.84%	22.34%	-10.95%	7.38%
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF	3.14%	25.29%	15.31%	9.41%	-0.35%	22.93%	1.51%	21.92%	-2.76%	11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011	0.75

The correlation between ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZDV.TO	ZLB.TO
Financial Services	35.2%	23.7%
Energy	27.2%	-
Basic Materials	10.6%	6.6%
Utilities	10.1%	17.6%
Communication Services	5.7%	9.2%
Real Estate	4.1%	4.3%
Industrials	2.7%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	18.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	8.6%
Healthcare	0.9%	-
Technology	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDV.TO

ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ZLB.TO

ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZDV.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.80	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.69	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.32	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.69	2.77	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.24	10.29	+7.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZDV.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.80	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.88	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.14	-0.46

Drawdowns

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.21%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZDV.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.21%	-33.96%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-5.36%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.04%	-8.01%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.72%	-13.00%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.21%	-33.96%	-9.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-1.70%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-2.46%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.45%	+0.26%

Volatility

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZDV.TO	ZLB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	2.47%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	6.38%	+3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.57%	8.29%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	9.44%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.11%	12.15%	+2.96%

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

ZDV.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF	2.68%	3.07%	3.57%	4.10%	4.10%	3.63%	4.48%	4.11%	5.06%	3.96%	3.84%	4.63%
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF	1.88%	1.93%	2.37%	2.67%	2.66%	2.39%	2.83%	2.44%	2.76%	2.52%	2.94%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO in my portfolio?

ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZDV.TO or ZLB.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZDV.TO or ZLB.TO?

ZDV.TO and ZLB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.