PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDV.TO achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than TQCD.TO's 14.98% return.


ZDV.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.61%
YTD
18.56%
6M
13.14%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
10.97%

TQCD.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.98%
YTD
14.98%
6M
17.36%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF
18.56%20.17%16.52%7.83%-1.93%28.40%-3.84%0.45%
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
14.98%33.11%22.27%12.29%1.68%26.29%-13.24%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2019

0.84

The correlation between ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZDV.TO
TQCD.TO

Financial Services

35.2%
35.4%

Energy

27.2%
21.1%

Basic Materials

10.6%
15.1%

Utilities

10.1%
5.1%

Communication Services

5.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

4.1%
3.8%

Industrials

2.7%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
2.6%

Healthcare

0.9%
0.3%

Technology

-

1.1%

Financial Services

ZDV.TO
35.2%
TQCD.TO
35.4%

Energy

ZDV.TO
27.2%
TQCD.TO
21.1%

Basic Materials

ZDV.TO
10.6%
TQCD.TO
15.1%

Utilities

ZDV.TO
10.1%
TQCD.TO
5.1%

Communication Services

ZDV.TO
5.7%
TQCD.TO
3.4%

Real Estate

ZDV.TO
4.1%
TQCD.TO
3.8%

Industrials

ZDV.TO
2.7%
TQCD.TO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZDV.TO
2.2%
TQCD.TO
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ZDV.TO
1.4%
TQCD.TO
2.6%

Healthcare

ZDV.TO
0.9%
TQCD.TO
0.3%

Technology

ZDV.TO

-

TQCD.TO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDV.TO
ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TQCD.TO
TQCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZDV.TOTQCD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.71

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

5.22

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.24

25.92

-7.68

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZDV.TOTQCD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

3.83

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Drawdowns

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.21%, smaller than the maximum TQCD.TO drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZDV.TOTQCD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.21%

-46.47%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-7.27%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

-12.42%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

-15.65%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.42%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-5.99%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.46%

+0.25%

Volatility

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) is 2.49%, while TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that ZDV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZDV.TOTQCD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.86%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

7.99%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

9.92%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

12.33%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

19.43%

-4.32%

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Dividends

ZDV.TO vs. TQCD.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than TQCD.TO's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
2.77%2.95%3.47%3.73%4.03%4.09%6.20%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF
2.68%3.07%3.57%4.10%4.10%3.63%4.48%4.11%5.06%3.96%3.84%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and TD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDV.TO and TQCD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer