ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO
ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) and CMR.TO (iShares Premium Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while CMR.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDV.TO returned 10.97%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for CMR.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ZDV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CMR.TO.
Performance
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDV.TO achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than CMR.TO's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDV.TO has outperformed CMR.TO with an annualized return of 10.97%, while CMR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
CMR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 2.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 18.56% | 20.17% | 16.52% | 7.83% | -1.93% | 28.40% | -3.84% | 22.34% | -10.95% | 7.38% |
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF | 0.97% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.70% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 1.29% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDV.TO and CMR.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDV.TO
CMR.TO
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZDV.TO | CMR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -17.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 9.57 | -7.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 25.44 | -20.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.24 | 187.33 | -169.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZDV.TO | CMR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | 10.61 | -7.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 10.67 | -9.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 7.02 | -6.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 3.84 | -3.16 |
Drawdowns
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.21%, which is greater than CMR.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDV.TO and CMR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDV.TO | CMR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.21% | -0.52% | -42.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -0.09% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | -0.09% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -0.09% | -16.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | -0.14% | -43.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.02% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -0.01% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.01% | +1.70% |
Volatility
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to iShares Premium Money Market ETF (CMR.TO) at 0.05%. This indicates that ZDV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDV.TO | CMR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 0.05% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 0.18% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 0.22% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 0.28% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 0.27% | +14.84% |
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CMR.TO's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDV.TO vs. CMR.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than CMR.TO's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMR.TO iShares Premium Money Market ETF | 2.48% | 2.81% | 4.56% | 4.64% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.61% | 0.43% | 0.48% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.57% | 4.10% | 4.10% | 3.63% | 4.48% | 4.11% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDV.TO and CMR.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZDV.TO.
ZDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CMR.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZDV.TO and 0.14% for CMR.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZDV.TO and CMR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer